Marketing Structured Giving and Philanthropy Advice to Clients Who Want Their Wealth to Do More Than Grow

13 October 2026·5 min read

Quick answer: Clients with meaningful wealth increasingly want to know their money is doing something beyond compounding quietly in the background — and structured giving is one of the most under-marketed conversations a financial planning practice can own. The opportunity is building genuine, values-led content and conversation prompts around giving, not a generic "philanthropy page" nobody reads. Done well, it deepens trust with existing clients and attracts the next generation of a family's wealth at the same time. ✨

Please note: general information, not financial advice — check current official guidance before relying on it.

There's a particular kind of client who has done well enough that the numbers on their statement have stopped being the interesting part of the conversation. They're not asking "how do I grow this more" — they're asking some version of "what's actually the point of all this now". That question is a gift for a financial planning practice, and most practices have no idea what to do with it beyond nodding and moving back to the portfolio review. We 💖 a conversation that's sitting right there waiting to be had, and structured giving is exactly that for a meaningful slice of any established client book.

Where most practices get this wrong

The default is to treat philanthropy as either irrelevant (assuming it's only for the ultra-wealthy) or purely tax-driven (reducing a values-based conversation to a structuring trick). Both miss the point. The clients most receptive aren't necessarily the wealthiest in the book — they're the ones at an inflection point: a business sale, a liquidity event, an inheritance, or years of steady accumulation reaching a point where "more" stops being the goal. Practices that market this well treat it as a values conversation that happens to have structuring options attached, not a structuring product dressed up as meaning.

The usable asset: a values-based conversation starter for annual reviews

Add these prompts to your annual or milestone review template — not as a sales script, but as genuine discovery questions:

"Is there a cause or community that's mattered to you for a long time, that we've never actually built into your plan?"
"If your wealth outlived you exactly as it is now, is that the story you'd want it to tell?"
"Have you and your family ever talked about giving together, rather than everyone giving separately?"
"Would it change anything to know giving can be structured, ongoing and tax-effective, rather than a one-off cheque?"

Pair this with one short, genuinely useful piece of content — a guide to the different shapes structured giving can take (a sub-fund within an existing public ancillary fund, a private ancillary foundation, testamentary giving structures) written in plain English, with no specific figures, positioned as a conversation starter rather than a product pitch.

A financial planning practice with an older, asset-rich client book nearing retirement: this practice noticed several long-term clients mentioning a desire to "leave something behind" beyond their children. Rather than folding this into a generic estate planning chat, they built a short "giving as part of your legacy" module into retirement planning reviews, which opened conversations that led to deeper engagement with the next generation of those families too.

A planner working with a family business that just sold: a sudden liquidity event is one of the most natural entry points for this conversation — the client has more cash than they've ever had at once, and the question of "what's this all for" is unusually live. This planner built a simple post-sale content sequence that included one piece specifically on structured giving as an option worth exploring before decisions got locked in elsewhere.

A practice working with next-generation clients inheriting family wealth: younger clients inheriting wealth often want it to reflect values their parents never explicitly discussed. A practice built content aimed squarely at this group — distinct in tone from material aimed at their parents — which became a genuine point of difference in attracting the next generation of existing client families rather than losing them to a competitor at the point of inheritance.

How to build this as an actual content pillar

Don't bury this on one static "philanthropy" page. Build a small content series: what structured giving actually means in plain English, the shapes it can take, questions worth asking before committing, and general examples of the kinds of situations where it comes up. Run it as a recurring theme in reviews for clients who fit the profile — not a blanket pitch to the whole book — and partner with a specialist foundation administrator so you're clear about what your practice advises on versus what's set up elsewhere.

💡 Lead with the family conversation, not the structure. The families who engage most deeply with giving conversations are the ones where it becomes a shared project between generations — a planner who facilitates that conversation earns trust that outlasts any single structure or product.

Mistakes to avoid

Don't position structured giving primarily as a tax strategy — it reads as cynical to the clients most likely to actually want it.
Don't assume only your wealthiest clients care — inflection points (a sale, an inheritance, retirement) matter more than raw net worth.
Don't use one piece of content for both the client who built the wealth and their adult children inheriting it — the conversation and tone genuinely differ.
Don't promise specific tax outcomes or cite specific caps and figures in marketing content — these vary by structure and change over time.
Don't make this a once-off page — it needs to surface naturally at genuine inflection points, not just live in a forgotten corner of the website.

Frequently asked questions

Is structured giving only relevant to very high-net-worth clients?

No — while some structures suit larger sums better than others, the conversation about values-based giving is relevant well before a client reaches that scale, and starting it early often shapes decisions made well before any structure is set up.

Should we administer giving structures ourselves or refer out?

This is a genuine trade-off. Some structures are straightforward enough to discuss within a standard advice conversation; others involve specialist foundation administration that's outside most planning practices' core offer. Being honest with clients (and yourselves) about where that line sits protects both your reputation and the relationship.

How do we talk about this without sounding like we're chasing a bigger fee?

Lead with discovery questions, not structure names. A conversation that starts with "what do you want your wealth to mean" lands very differently from one that opens with a specific product.

What's the honest limitation of marketing this?

Giving structures vary enormously in complexity, cost and suitability, and what works for one family can be wrong for another's — content can open the conversation, but it can't substitute for a proper, individual assessment of whether a structure makes sense.

Keep reading 🤍

Written by

Kate, founder of Chronically Online

I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.

Work with me ✦