Advising a Client Who Inherits a Business, Not Just an Investment Portfolio

13 October 2026·5 min read

Quick answer: When a client inherits a business rather than a share portfolio, the first conversation needs a completely different structure. Lead with triage — cash, legal authority, staff, and obligations — not technical advice, and bring the accountant and lawyer in early. Practices that handle this well treat it as a staged 90-day transition, not a single meeting. 📈

Please note: general information, not financial or legal advice — check current official guidance, and speak with a qualified accountant, lawyer and financial adviser, before relying on it.

Most "client inherits money" content assumes the inheritance arrives tidily — shares, cash, a parcel of ETFs. But a genuinely common version isn't tidy at all: a trading business with a ute, a workshop lease, four staff on the books, and a supplier relationship built on the deceased's personal handshake. 💖 If your practice only has a workflow for "liquid asset lands, reassess the portfolio," you'll miss the client who needs you most — the one suddenly, accidentally, running a business they never asked to run.

What most financial planners get wrong with an inherited business

The most common mistake is treating the business as a valuation problem first and a human problem second. Advisers jump to "let's get it valued," when the client is three weeks into working out whether there's enough cash to make payroll on Friday. The valuation matters eventually — it's rarely the most urgent thing.

The second mistake is assuming the client wants to keep running it, sell it, or wind it down, and building the whole conversation around whichever one you guessed. Some haven't decided. Your job in meeting one is to find out which way they're leaning, and make sure they don't accidentally lock themselves into a path by doing nothing.

The usable asset: a First 30 Days triage script

Use this as the running order for meeting one:

Cash runway: "Is there enough in the account to cover wages and supplier bills for the next four weeks?"
Legal structure: "Sole trader, company, trust or partnership — have you inherited shares, units or the assets themselves?"
People: "Is there someone who can keep the doors open for the next fortnight while we work this out?"
Obligations: "Are there supplier contracts, leases or guarantees in the deceased's name needing immediate attention?"
Intentions: "On a gut level — are you leaning toward keeping it, selling it, closing it, or undecided?"
Team: "Who else is already involved — accountant, solicitor, broker — so we're not contradicting each other?"

That's deliberate — this script is for week one. The technical work comes after triage, once you know what you're actually solving for.

The solo tradie's widow: A client inherits her late husband's one-truck electrical business — no other directors, no second signatory on the account, and two apprentices mid-qualification. The urgent issue isn't investment strategy, it's that nobody can legally authorise payments until probate is granted. Planning starts with cashflow bridging and a solicitor referral, not a risk-profile conversation.

The reluctant co-owner: Three adult siblings jointly inherit their parents' independent supermarket. One wants to sell, one wants to run it, one lives interstate and wants to be left alone. This is a family-governance problem wearing a financial-planning costume — your value is facilitating a structured conversation about buyout mechanics, not advising any one sibling in isolation, which creates an obvious conflict.

The accidental sole director: A client inherits a small bookkeeping practice her mother built over twenty years, where every client relationship is personal and undocumented. There's real goodwill value on paper, but almost none of it is transferable without the mother's relationships — a key-person risk that affects both the sale value and the client's decision about running it herself.

How to structure the ongoing advice relationship

Once triage is done, the real work is sequencing. Resist delivering one comprehensive plan in meeting two — decisions depend on information that isn't available yet, like probate timing or whether key staff will stay. A workable sequence looks like: stabilise, understand (valuation alongside the accountant), decide, then integrate the outcome into the client's broader plan, super, estate plan, insurance, now that their risk profile has changed. Your referral network does the heavy lifting here — you're the coordinator keeping everyone aligned around what the client actually wants, not the valuer or the lawyer.

💡 Don't let "we'll sort the paperwork later" become the plan. The biggest cause of a messy, expensive outcome here isn't a bad decision — it's drift. Weeks pass, nobody's formally authorised to run the bank account, staff start leaving because nobody's told them anything, and a straightforward sale option quietly becomes a distressed one. Your first job is often just getting a decision-maker named and a 30-day action list signed off.

Mistakes to avoid when marketing and delivering this advice

Don't market this as generic "estate planning" — these clients use specific language, not broad estate-planning copy.
Don't promise a valuation or tax outcome in your marketing — direct readers to their accountant and a qualified valuer instead.
Don't advise multiple siblings or co-inheritors as though they're one client — flag the conflict early.
Don't skip the "do you even want to keep it" conversation to look technically impressive.

Frequently asked questions

Should a financial planner be involved before or after probate is granted?

As early as possible — there's useful triage and coordination work to do before probate, even though some formal actions have to wait. Early involvement means less drift and a better-informed client once decisions become urgent.

Is this type of advice within a typical financial planner's scope, or does it need a business advisory specialist?

Honest nuance: most financial planners aren't business valuers or M&A advisers, and shouldn't pretend to be. Your value is coordination, not replacing a good accountant or commercial lawyer — be upfront about where your advice ends.

How do you handle advising when there are multiple beneficiaries with different goals?

Carefully, and usually by being explicit about who your client actually is. Conflicting sibling interests make advising all of them a real conflict — it's often better to advise one and refer the others separately.

What's the single most useful thing to say in the first meeting?

Something like: "We don't need to decide anything today — just what can't wait, and what can." It takes the pressure off a grieving, overwhelmed client, and it's usually true.

Keep reading 🤍

Written by

Kate, founder of Chronically Online

I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.

Work with me ✦