Website Accessibility for Financial Planning Practices: A Plain-English Guide to WCAG
Here's a thing nobody tells financial planners briefing a new website: the client who most needs your advice is often the one your site is quietest for. Older prospects, someone recovering from a stroke, low vision squinting at 11px grey-on-white text — accessibility isn't a niche edge case here, it's a decent slice of your actual audience. Get the basics right and you widen the front door instead of half-closing it. 💖
What most financial planning practices get wrong
- Treating accessibility as a legal checkbox — the goal isn't "can we defend this," it's "can a 70-year-old prospect with cataracts read our fee page."
- Low-contrast "premium" design — pale grey on cream looks elegant on a designer's monitor and is genuinely hard to read for real humans.
- Decorative-only alt text — images tagged "hero-banner-2.jpg" or left blank tell screen reader users nothing about who you are.
- Forms with no labels attached — a placeholder that disappears on click isn't a label, and screen readers know it.
- Assuming it's a once-off project — a site can be accessible at launch and quietly stop being three redesigns later.
The plain-English accessibility checklist
This isn't a WCAG line-by-line audit — it's the shortlist that catches most of what actually trips people up, in the order we'd tackle it:
Three practices, three quick wins
None of these needed a rebuild — just targeted fixes once someone actually looked. 📈
How to actually get this done without a full audit
You don't need an accessibility consultant to make real progress. Start with a free automated scan to flag obvious contrast and alt text issues, fix the easy wins first, then do one manual pass: tab through your own site with the mouse unplugged, and read the homepage at 200% zoom. Most of what matters shows up in that half hour. For anything touching an actual legal obligation rather than usability, loop in whoever handles compliance for your licensee first.
Mistakes that undo the good work
- Fixing it once and never again — a new hero video, PDF or redesigned form can quietly reintroduce the same problems.
- Relying only on an automated scanner — tools catch maybe a third of real issues; a five-minute manual check catches a lot more.
- Over-claiming compliance — saying you "meet WCAG AA" without proper checking is a bigger risk than saying nothing at all.
- Assuming accessible means ugly — good design and accessible design aren't opposites.
Frequently asked questions
Is website accessibility a legal requirement for financial planning practices in Australia?
There are existing discrimination laws that can apply to websites, and expectations here are tightening generally — but whether a specific standard formally applies to your practice is a question for your compliance team or a lawyer, not a blog post. Treat this guide as best-practice usability, not a legal determination.
Do I need to redo my whole website to make it accessible?
Almost never. Most of the impact comes from a short list of fixes — contrast, alt text, form labels, heading structure — that can be applied to an existing site without touching the design or the build.
Will making my site more accessible hurt the premium feel of my brand?
It can if it's done badly — giant black text over a soft palette reads as a compliance patch, not a brand. Done properly, using better contrast within your existing colours, most clients won't notice anything changed except that the site reads more easily.
How often should we check this?
Do a proper pass whenever you redesign or add a major new page type (a new lead magnet PDF, a new video series), and a quick manual spot-check — tab through, zoom in — every six months or so. It's cheap insurance against slow drift. 🌴
Keep reading 🤍
I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.
Work with me ✦