How Financial Planners Should Talk to Clients About Underperforming Investments
Here's the moment financial planners dread 💖: a client opens their statement, sees a number they don't like, and calls in already anxious. The instinct is to wait and see if they raise it. The better move, almost always, is to raise it first — a planner who names the dip before the client does looks in control of the situation, not caught out by it.
What Most Financial Planners Get Wrong
The common mistake is waiting for the client to bring it up, then responding defensively once they do — explaining market conditions in a way that can sound like an excuse rather than context. The second mistake is over-explaining market mechanics when what the client actually wants to know is much simpler: does this change anything about my plan?
The Script
"I wanted to flag that your portfolio's had a rougher quarter than usual — down around [X]%, mostly driven by [general cause]. Here's the important part: this is within the range of movement we expected when we set your strategy for a [timeframe]-year horizon, and it doesn't change our plan.
That said, I always want to check in when there's been a noticeable move — has anything changed on your end, like your timeframe or how comfortable you're feeling with this level of movement?"
The final question matters as much as the explanation — it turns a one-way reassurance into a genuine check-in.
The Mechanics: Timing the Conversation
Set a proactive threshold — a percentage move that triggers an outbound call rather than waiting for the client to notice. Keep the explanation short and put the forward-look question at the end, not buried in the middle of market commentary.
Mistakes to Avoid
- Waiting for the client to raise the underperformance first
- Over-explaining market mechanics instead of addressing the client's underlying question
- Failing to check whether the client's own circumstances have changed
- Treating every dip the same way regardless of the client's timeframe or risk profile
Frequently asked questions
What threshold should trigger a proactive call?
This varies by practice and client base — some use a percentage move, others a dollar figure. The specific number matters less than having one and using it consistently.
Should this be a call or is email enough?
A call for anything triggering the proactive threshold; email is fine for smaller, expected movements covered in a regular update.
What if the underperformance really is due to a strategy issue, not just market movement?
Be honest about that distinction — conflating a genuine strategy review with normal volatility undermines trust more than the original issue would have.
How do you reassure without sounding like you're minimising the client's concern?
Validate the concern explicitly before reassuring — "that's a fair thing to notice" before explaining context, rather than jumping straight to reassurance.
Keep reading 🤍
I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.
Work with me ✦