When a Client Asks for a Letter to Support an NDIS or Court Matter
Every psychology practice gets this request eventually, and most handle the first one badly 💖 — not because anyone did anything wrong clinically, but because there was no system for it. The letter gets squeezed in between sessions, the fee gets decided on the spot (usually too low), and three weeks later the client is calling to ask where it is. A simple policy, written once and reused every time, fixes almost all of that.
What most psychology practices get wrong
The most common mistake is treating every letter request as a one-off favour rather than a billable clinical task with its own scope. Clinicians agree to "write something" without clarifying what the referrer or court actually needs, then end up guessing at the format, rewriting it twice, and absorbing hours of unpaid admin. The second mistake is scope creep: a client asks for a letter supporting their NDIS review, but what they're really hoping for is an opinion on custody arrangements or a guarantee the letter will "win" their case. Being warm doesn't mean being vague about what a clinical letter can and can't do — and it's not legal advice, so practices shouldn't try to sound like it is.
"Thanks for letting me know you need a letter for [NDIS review / Centrelink / your lawyer]. A few things so we're on the same page: I can write from a clinical perspective — things like your diagnosis history, how your presentation affects daily functioning, and treatment to date. I can't give a legal opinion on the outcome, and I won't speculate outside what I've directly observed in sessions. Letters like this usually take [X business days] once I have everything I need from you, and the fee is [$X], which reflects the file review and writing time, not just the page count. If you can send me the exact request (the form, the solicitor's letter, or the NDIS request) that helps me write to what's actually being asked for, rather than guessing."
How to build the policy once and reuse it
Start with a one-page internal guide answering four questions: what letters we write, what we charge, how long it takes, and what we need from the client before the clock starts. Put a simplified, client-facing version in your welcome pack so expectations are shared from the first ask. Train reception to use the same script, and build in a review step before anything goes out that could end up in a court file — these letters carry more weight than a standard clinical summary.
Mistakes to avoid
- Agreeing to write "something" before clarifying who the letter is actually for and what they need it to say.
- Undercharging because it "feels like a quick favour" — a defensible letter rarely is quick.
- Promising a turnaround you haven't checked against your actual diary.
- Letting a client believe the letter guarantees a particular NDIS, Centrelink or court outcome.
- Writing outside your clinical observations to fill a gap the client is hoping you'll fill.
Frequently asked questions
Can a psychologist refuse to write a letter?
Yes — if the request falls outside their scope, outside what they've clinically observed, or asks for an opinion better suited to an independent assessor, declining (and explaining why, and referring on where possible) is a reasonable and common response.
How long should a letter like this actually take?
It depends on the complexity of the request — a short confirmation might take under an hour, while a detailed NDIS or court-related letter can realistically take several hours once reading, drafting and review are factored in. Quoting one standard turnaround for every request is the honest nuance most practices skip: some letters genuinely need longer, and saying so upfront avoids a frustrated client later.
Does the letter guarantee the NDIS or court outcome the client wants?
No, and practices shouldn't imply otherwise. A clinical letter is one piece of evidence among several that a decision-maker will weigh — being upfront about that limit protects both the client's expectations and the clinician's credibility.
Should the fee be different for a court-related letter versus an NDIS one?
Many practices do scale fees to complexity and risk — a letter that may be scrutinised in a legal proceeding typically warrants more review time than a routine NDIS plan confirmation, so it's reasonable for the fee to reflect that.
Keep reading 🤍
I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.
Work with me ✦