← Back to blog

How Financial Planners Should Market Aged Pension and Centrelink Advice

15 September 2026·6 min read
Quick answer: Market aged pension and Centrelink advice with general, education-first content (blog posts, guides, short videos) that explains how the system works, never with specific promises about someone's payment going up. Use local SEO to catch the "centrelink advice [suburb]" searches, build a lead magnet that funnels into a real conversation, and keep every public piece clearly labelled as general information. The goal is to look like the calm, competent adult in the room — not to give free personal advice on the internet. 📈

If you work with pre-retirees, you already know the Centrelink and aged pension conversation is where a lot of clients get genuinely anxious. Asset tests, deeming rates, the family home, gifting rules — it's confusing, it changes every year, and most people have Googled themselves into a mild panic before they ever book a meeting with you. That's actually your opening. Nobody expects a government pension system explainer to be interesting, so when your content is clear and calm instead of jargon-heavy, you stand out fast. Done well, this is one of the most trust-building content angles a financial planning practice can run, and it consistently brings in warm, ready-to-talk leads. 💖 Done badly, it's either a compliance headache or a page nobody reads.

What most financial planners get wrong

There are two failure modes, and practices tend to fall into one or the other. The first is avoidance — Centrelink and the age pension get treated as "not really our thing" because it feels like DSS territory rather than financial advice, so the practice never publishes anything on it and loses all that search traffic to Services Australia's own (fairly dry) pages. The second, more risky mistake is overclaiming: content that implies "we got a client an extra $180 a fortnight" or promises specific outcomes. That's not just bad practice, it edges into misleading advertising territory under the general advice/personal advice distinction, because a fortnightly payment outcome depends entirely on someone's individual assets, income and circumstances. The content that actually works sits in the middle: genuinely useful, specific enough to be worth reading, but framed as general information that leads to a personal conversation rather than replacing one.

The compliant content formula (copy this structure)

Headline template: "[Confusing Centrelink thing] explained — what it actually means for your age pension"
e.g. "The assets test vs the income test, explained — what it actually means for your age pension"

Body structure for every piece:

  • 1. The plain-English explainer — what the rule/threshold/test is, in one paragraph, no jargon.
  • 2. Why it trips people up — the common misunderstanding (e.g. "people assume the family home counts, it usually doesn't").
  • 3. What we can't tell you here — one honest line: "Your own numbers depend on your full asset and income picture, which is exactly what we go through in a review."
  • 4. The bridge CTA — "Want to know where you actually sit? Book a free 20-minute pension health check" (booking link).

Lead magnet headline formula: "The [Number]-Point Age Pension Check for [Life Stage]" — e.g. "The 7-Point Age Pension Check for Aussies Turning 65 in the Next 2 Years."

Regional solo planner: A one-adviser practice in a Sunshine Coast hinterland town built a simple SEO page targeting "centrelink advice [town name]" plus four blog posts on gifting rules, the assets test, deeming rates and downsizer contributions. Nothing flashy — just clear writing and a booking link at the end of each. Within four months it was the practice's second-biggest source of new client enquiries, almost entirely from people who'd already self-diagnosed a problem and wanted someone to check their thinking.
Mid-size practice running a webinar funnel: A six-adviser firm ran a quarterly "Retiring in the Next 5 Years" webinar, promoted through Facebook and their email list, with Centrelink and aged pension basics as one segment of three. The webinar itself stayed general (no numbers about individuals), but the follow-up email sequence offered a one-on-one review. Webinars aren't for everyone — they take real production effort — but for a practice with the resourcing, it consistently outperformed static blog content for booking rate.
Practice worried about "giving advice for free": One firm we worked with was nervous that explaining the assets test publicly was basically giving away the advice. The fix wasn't to hide the information — it was tightening the "what we can't tell you here" line in every piece so it was unmistakably general, and making sure nothing implied a specific dollar outcome for a hypothetical reader. The information stayed public; the personalised calculation stayed behind the consultation.

How to actually build this

Pick 5-6 content pillars, not one giant guide

Centrelink and pension content works better as a series than one mega-page. Good pillars: the assets test, the income test, deeming rates, gifting rules, the family home and downsizer contributions, and the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card. Each becomes its own page or post, each targets its own search terms, and each gets its own CTA.

Write for the person who's already worried

Your reader has usually already read something scary on a forum. Open by naming the worry directly ("Wondering if selling your home will wipe out your pension?") rather than starting with a definition. It signals you understand the emotional side, not just the technical side.

Build the bridge, every time

Every piece needs the same soft handover: acknowledge the general information has limits, then offer the specific next step. Without that bridge, you've just written a free public service announcement with no path back to your business.

💡 The line to hold is "explain the rule, don't calculate the outcome." You can publish exactly how the assets test works all day long — that's public information anyone can find on the Services Australia site anyway. The moment your content implies what a specific reader's payment would be, you've crossed from general information into something that needs to be treated as personal advice, and a blog post isn't the place for that.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Quoting a client's actual payment increase as a marketing "result" without informed consent, and without it reading as a guarantee to prospective readers.
  • Writing one enormous "everything about Centrelink" page instead of focused pieces that can actually rank for specific searches.
  • Forgetting to date-stamp content — thresholds and rates change, usually twice a year, and stale figures look sloppy fast.
  • No clear CTA, so the reader finishes an excellent explainer and has nowhere to go next.
  • Treating this as a one-off blog sprint instead of an ongoing pillar — the searches are evergreen, your content should be too.
Please note: general information, not financial advice — check current official guidance before relying on it.

Frequently asked questions

Can we quote specific dollar thresholds and payment rates in our content?

Yes — current published thresholds and rates are public government information, and quoting them accurately (with a clear "as at [date]" note) is genuinely useful content. Where it gets murky is the honest nuance: those figures change regularly, usually in March and September, so anything you publish needs a maintenance plan or a visible date stamp, otherwise you risk publishing outdated numbers that read as advice gone stale rather than advice at all.

Should this content sit on our main site or a separate landing page?

Your main site, as part of your normal blog or resources section, ideally grouped under a clear "Retirement & Aged Pension" category so it reads as a genuine specialty rather than a one-off post.

Is it worth gating the lead magnet behind an email address?

For a downloadable checklist or guide, yes — it's a reasonable exchange and builds your nurture list. For the individual blog posts themselves, don't gate those; you want them indexed and freely readable for SEO, with the gated asset offered as a secondary CTA.

How technical should the language be?

Plain English, always. Your reader is smart but not a planner. If you wouldn't say a sentence out loud to a client at your desk, rewrite it.


Keep reading 🤍

Share
Written by
Kate, founder of Chronically Online

I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.

Work with me ✦