Legal Advertising Rules in Australia: What Law Firms Can (and Can't) Say in Marketing
Every marketing person who's worked with a law firm has had this moment: someone on the partner group chat asks "are we even allowed to say this?" about an ad that's already scheduled to go live in an hour. Most firms don't have a compliance problem — they have a process problem. Nobody ever wrote down what "allowed" actually means, so every piece of content gets judged on vibes 💖. The fix isn't a 40-page policy document nobody reads. It's a short, repeatable checklist that anyone on the marketing team can run through in five minutes before anything gets published.
What most law firms get wrong on advertising compliance
The most common mistake isn't a rogue ad with a wild guarantee — it's inconsistency. The website copy is careful and lawyer-approved, but the intern running Instagram Stories writes "we ALWAYS win" in a caption without thinking twice, because nobody told them the rules apply to a 24-hour Story just as much as a billboard. The second mistake is assuming compliance is only about big, obvious claims. In reality, a lot of breaches are quieter things: an "as seen in" badge that's technically true but implies an endorsement that never happened, a client testimonial posted without proper consent, or fee language that's accurate on the website but glossed over in the ad that drove the click. Compliance isn't one big rule to remember — it's a habit of checking the small stuff every single time.
The pre-publish compliance checklist
Run every ad, post, page and email past this before it goes live:
- No guaranteed outcomes — no promises about winning, timeframes, or specific results ("we'll get you full custody," "guaranteed payout").
- No disparaging other firms — direct or implied comparisons that put competitors down, even if true, are risky territory.
- Clear fee disclosure — if you mention pricing, "free consultation" or "no win no fee," the actual terms need to be genuinely accessible, not buried three clicks deep.
- No unearned specialisation claims — "specialist" or "expert" language is fine only if backed by formal accreditation; otherwise use "experienced in" or "focused on."
- Testimonials have documented consent — and don't imply a guaranteed result for the reader based on someone else's case.
- Nothing misleading about experience — "20 years in family law" should mean the firm, not one junior associate's personal tenure, unless it's clearly attributed.
- Confidentiality intact — no identifying case details shared without explicit, informed client sign-off.
- A named, real person signs off — someone senior actually reads it, not just the person who wrote it.
Print it, stick it above the marketing team's desk, and make it the very last step before "publish."
How this actually works day to day
- One person owns sign-off. Not a committee — one senior person who's genuinely across your state's rules, with a clear turnaround time (same day, ideally).
- The checklist travels with the content, not just the final published version — so a Story, a boosted post, and a Google review reply all get the same five-minute check, not just the "big" campaigns.
- Templates get pre-approved. Once a testimonial format, an ad structure or an email footer has been checked once, it doesn't need re-litigating every time — only new claims need fresh eyes.
- Audits happen quarterly, not just when something goes live — old posts and outdated fee pages are just as much a compliance risk as new ones.
Mistakes to avoid
- Assuming social media posts are lower-stakes than website copy — the rules apply equally.
- Using "specialist" or "expert" casually without checking accreditation status.
- Posting client testimonials without documented, specific consent.
- Letting junior staff or agencies publish without a compliance-literate sign-off step.
- Treating the checklist as a one-off exercise instead of a standing habit.
- Forgetting that old, unaudited content is still "live" marketing.
Frequently asked questions
Are the advertising rules the same in every Australian state?
No — while the broad principles (no misleading claims, no guaranteed outcomes, clear fees) are consistent nationally, the specific rules sit with each state's Legal Services Commission or Law Society, and wording can differ. If your firm operates across state lines, check the strictest applicable rule set rather than assuming one state's guidance covers you everywhere.
Can we use client testimonials at all?
Generally yes, with documented consent and care not to imply a guaranteed outcome for future clients based on one person's result. Some jurisdictions have specific conditions around testimonials for certain practice areas, so this is one area worth double-checking directly rather than assuming a blanket yes.
Does this checklist replace getting advice from our own compliance officer or Law Society?
Honestly, no — and it isn't meant to. It's a practical first filter that catches the majority of everyday marketing risks before they go live. It doesn't replace a proper compliance review for anything genuinely borderline, a new campaign format, or advertising in a new state. Treat it as the first line of defence, not the last.
What actually happens if an ad breaches the rules?
It varies — sometimes it's a quiet request to take something down, sometimes it's a formal complaint process through your Legal Services Commission. Either way it's a distraction and a reputational risk nobody needs, which is exactly why the five-minute checklist habit is worth the friction.
Keep reading 🤍
I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.
Work with me ✦