How Law Firms Should Handle a Negative Google Review (Without Breaching Client Confidentiality)
Every law firm gets one eventually — a two-star review from someone who's furious about a result, a fee, or a phone call that didn't get returned fast enough. The instinct is to set the record straight. That instinct is exactly what gets firms in trouble. The record you're allowed to set straight is a lot smaller than most people think, and the way you respond publicly says more about your judgement than the review itself ever will. 💖
What most firms get wrong
- Confirming the relationship — replying "we did act for you and disagree with your account" confirms someone was a client, which is often the one thing you're not supposed to do publicly.
- Relitigating the matter — explaining the outcome, the advice given, or "what actually happened" in the reply box, where anyone can screenshot it.
- Going quiet — ignoring the review entirely reads as guilt to everyone else who finds it later, even when the firm did nothing wrong.
- Getting defensive in tone — a snippy reply is the thing prospective clients remember, not the original review.
- Responding from personal accounts — a partner arguing back as themselves rather than the firm, which looks worse and is harder to walk back.
The response formula
This structure works whether the review is fair, unfair, or from someone who was never actually a client at all — because it never depends on which of those is true.
Five moves, every time: thanks, a values statement, the confidentiality line (doing real work, not just sounding formal), an invitation offline, and a named point of contact. Nothing in it confirms or denies a relationship, and nothing in it re-argues the matter.
Worked examples
Same formula, adjusted in tone for the practice area — a criminal defence firm needs a slightly firmer, calmer register than a family law firm. 📈
How to actually run this when it happens
Set a rule before you need it: one nominated person drafts every review reply, using the formula above as the starting point — not a fresh reply from scratch under stress. Reply within a business day or two; a fast, calm reply reads better than a slow, perfect one. If the review names a staff member or makes an allegation that could be defamatory or clearly false, that's a conversation for whoever handles your firm's risk and compliance, not something to resolve in the reply box. Always assume the reply will be screenshotted and read by someone who was never a client — write for that reader, not the reviewer.
Mistakes to avoid once you're actually replying
- Editing the template every time — improvising under pressure is how confidentiality slips happen; stick to the approved wording.
- Replying at midnight, annoyed — wait until someone level-headed can send it, even if that's the next morning.
- Deleting and re-posting — it doesn't remove what was screenshotted, and it can make a firm look like it's hiding something.
- Letting multiple people reply to the same review — one voice, one message, every time.
- Forgetting to follow up privately — if you offer a direct line, make sure someone actually answers it.
Frequently asked questions
Can we ask Google to remove a negative review?
You can report a review that appears to breach Google's own content policies (fake, off-topic, spam, or clearly abusive), and Google decides whether to remove it — there's no guarantee, and a review that's simply unflattering but genuine usually won't qualify. Check current Google Business Profile guidance for what counts.
What if the review names a lawyer directly?
Keep the reply exactly as neutral and general as any other review — naming names in the response, even to defend someone, still edges toward confirming details of a matter. Loop in whoever manages risk at your firm if it goes further than a standard review.
Should we ever offer a refund or discount in the reply?
No — that's a conversation to have privately, if at all, once the matter is properly understood. Publicly offering anything can look like an admission, and it invites other reviewers to expect the same.
Does responding actually help, or should we just ignore it?
It genuinely depends on the review and your firm's risk appetite — a calm, professional reply usually reassures other readers more than it resolves anything with the original reviewer, and for a handful of reviews (clearly fake, or clearly defamatory) reporting rather than replying may be the better first move. There's no single right answer for every case. 🌴
Keep reading 🤍
I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.
Work with me ✦