5 Financial Planning Marketing Myths That Attract the Wrong Clients
Most financial planning marketing I see is either painfully generic or accidentally attracts exactly the wrong kind of enquiry — someone chasing a stock tip, or a one-off question, rather than an ongoing advice relationship. 💖 Usually it's not a strategy problem. It's a handful of myths the practice has been operating on for years without ever testing them.
The 5 myths, and what they actually cost you
Myth 1: "Any lead is a good lead." An enquiry who isn't a genuine fit — wrong life stage, unsuitable complexity, chasing something you don't offer — still costs meeting time, and mismatched expectations are a common source of frustrated first meetings and poor reviews. Volume isn't the goal.
Myth 2: "We can't market fees or value because of compliance." Practices often use "compliance" as a blanket reason to avoid any specifics at all, which just makes marketing vague and unconvincing. In general terms, you usually can describe how you charge and what you help with — the specific wording is what needs checking with your compliance team, not the entire topic.
Myth 3: "Content has to sound technical to seem credible." Jargon tends to signal "this isn't written for you" far more than it signals expertise. Plain language that respects the reader's intelligence, while staying accurate, tends to perform better and still reads as credible.
Myth 4: "We need to appeal to everyone to grow." Broad appeal usually just means vague appeal. Niching by client type, life stage or complexity tends to attract more qualified enquiries — not necessarily fewer, and often more once you factor in conversion.
Myth 5: "Testimonials are the fastest way to build trust." For financial planners this is a genuinely restricted area under best interests duty and related obligations — check with your compliance team before using client testimonials in any form, rather than assuming they're fine because another practice uses them.
Go through your last three months of marketing — website, socials, ads — and tick what's genuinely true:
- ☐ We've published something in the last month written in plain English, not adviser-speak
- ☐ Our calls-to-action say who we're a good fit for, not just "get in touch"
- ☐ We can point to specific content — not just testimonials — that builds trust
- ☐ We track how many enquiries convert to actual clients, not just enquiry volume
- ☐ Our fee or value information is at least general, not entirely hidden
- ☐ We could describe our ideal client in one sentence, and our content reflects it
Score: 5–6 ticked, you're mostly there. 3–4, pick one gap and fix it this quarter. 0–2, your marketing is probably attracting the wrong crowd.
How to actually attract the right clients instead
Define your ideal client explicitly — not just demographics, but complexity level, life stage and values. Write content that names who it's not for, as much as who it is for. Check every substantive wording change with your compliance team or AFSL before it goes live — that step genuinely isn't optional. And track the quality of enquiries, not just the count, as a real marketing metric.
Mistakes to avoid
- Treating every enquiry as equally valuable
- Assuming vague marketing is automatically "safe" — it's often just ineffective, and still needs compliance review
- Copying another practice's testimonial-heavy marketing without checking your own compliance obligations
- Writing for a "general audience" so broad it doesn't reflect a real reader
- Avoiding any mention of fees anywhere, including your own website
Frequently asked questions
Is it true financial planners can't talk about fees at all in marketing?
No — you can typically describe your fee structure and how you charge in general terms; what you usually can't do is make specific claims about returns or give personal advice without the proper process. Always confirm current wording with your compliance team, since requirements vary by licensee.
Are testimonials completely banned for financial planners?
It's a genuinely restricted area under best interests duty and related obligations, and the safe move is to check with your compliance team before using client testimonials in any form, rather than assume it's fine.
Won't niching down reduce the number of leads we get?
Often the opposite happens in practice — fewer but better-matched enquiries tend to convert to actual clients at a higher rate, though the raw enquiry number on a dashboard can look smaller, which is worth explaining to anyone in the practice who tracks that figure.
How technical should our content actually be?
Accurate, always — but "technical" and "jargon-heavy" aren't the same thing. You can explain a complex idea in plain English without dumbing down the substance underneath it.
Keep reading 🤍
I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.
Work with me ✦