Getting Found on Adviser Ratings and Comparison Directories: A Financial Planner's Overlooked Channel

05 September 2026·4 min read

Quick answer: Adviser ratings sites and the public ASIC Financial Advisers Register are worth claiming and keeping accurate, because they're often where a prospect goes to fact-check you after finding you somewhere else — not because they'll flood you with leads on their own. Treat them as trust infrastructure that has to match your website and LinkedIn exactly, not a marketing channel in isolation. 🌴

A lot of financial planners either ignore adviser directories entirely, or set them up once during licensing and never look at them again. Meanwhile a growing number of prospects, especially the more cautious, research-first ones, are quietly cross-checking a planner against the public Financial Advisers Register or a ratings site before they ever book a meeting. If what they find doesn't match what's on your website, that mismatch does real damage — often silently, because they just don't book. I've got 💖 for planners who treat this unglamorous admin as seriously as their actual marketing, because it closes a gap almost nobody else is watching.

What most planners get wrong

Two things happen constantly. First, directory profiles are left blank, auto-generated, or years out of date — wrong licensee, old areas of advice, a bio that doesn't match the website. Second, and more serious, some planners treat review sections on these platforms like product testimonials, inviting clients to leave reviews that imply investment performance or specific returns. That's a compliance risk, not just a bad look — reviews should speak to service and communication, never to outcomes.

Directory profile audit checklist (run this quarterly):

ASIC Financial Advisers Register (via Moneysmart): correct licensee, correct areas of advice, current employment status.
Adviser Ratings or similar comparison platforms: bio, photo, specialisation description, and fee model description all present and current.
Professional association directories (e.g. FAAA): membership status and any credentials listed correctly.
Google Business Profile: category, description and any Q&A section consistent with everything above.
Cross-check: read your website bio, LinkedIn headline and directory bios side by side — they should tell the same story, not three slightly different ones.

Trigger for an immediate recheck: any change of licensee, adviser name, or areas of advice — not just the quarterly calendar reminder.

Solo planner: claimed a dormant Adviser Ratings profile and rewrote the specialisation description in plain English instead of jargon. Enquiries that came in afterwards arrived already understanding the fee model, which shortened the first meeting considerably.

Planner who'd changed AFSL: hadn't updated the public Financial Advisers Register listing, and a prospective client raised it directly in a first meeting, asking why the details didn't match — an avoidable, awkward moment.

Small planning practice: built a short, plain-English "how we charge" FAQ page on their own site to sit alongside their directory presence, so a prospect cross-checking them lands on a consistent, non-salesy explanation rather than silence.

How to build this out

Claim or verify your listing on every directory relevant to your licence type and location.
Align bio wording across directories, your website and LinkedIn — not word-for-word identical, but consistent in facts and tone.
Avoid any review or testimonial language implying returns, performance or specific financial outcomes.
Set a recurring quarterly reminder to recheck accuracy, plus an ad hoc check whenever licensee or adviser details change.
Distinguish genuine trust directories from paid lead-reseller sites dressed up as "comparison platforms" before paying for a premium listing.

💡 Some "comparison" sites are lead funnels, not directories. Before paying for a premium listing, check whether the site actually helps prospects verify you, or whether it's mainly selling your contact details on to whoever pays for the placement.

Mistakes to avoid

Leaving a directory profile blank, outdated or auto-generated for years.
Letting reviews or testimonials imply investment performance or guaranteed outcomes.
Having a bio on your website that contradicts your public register listing.
Paying for a premium directory placement without checking who actually sees it.
Treating directory work as a one-off task instead of a recurring check.

Please note: general information, not financial advice — check current official guidance before relying on it.

Frequently asked questions

Do directory listings actually generate leads on their own?

Rarely as a standalone channel. Their real value is supporting trust once someone is already checking you out via another channel — think of them as a trust layer, not top-of-funnel lead generation.

Which directory matters most?

The public Financial Advisers Register matters most for legitimacy, since it's the official record. Ratings and comparison sites matter more for how a prospect perceives you, but neither replaces the other.

Can we ask clients to leave reviews on these platforms?

Be cautious and steer clear of anything that reads as a performance or outcome-based endorsement; keep any encouraged feedback focused on service, communication and process.

How often should we actually check this stuff?

Quarterly as a baseline, plus immediately after any change to licensee, adviser status, or areas of advice — those changes are the ones prospects are most likely to notice a mismatch on.

Keep reading 🤍

Written by

Kate, founder of Chronically Online

I help Gold Coast and Brisbane businesses grow with branding, websites and marketing that actually works.

Work with me ✦